Sovereign Debt Renegotiation and Credit Default Swaps
نویسنده
چکیده
A credit default swap (CDS) contract provides insurance against default. After a country defaults, the country and its lenders usually negotiate over the share of the defaulted debt to be repaid. This paper incorporates CDS contracts into a sovereign default model and demonstrates that the existence of a CDS market results in lower default probability, higher debt levels, and lower nancing costs for the country. Since the CDS payout is not automatically triggered by losses from renegotiations, the lender needs to be compensated for lower expected insurance payments. This leads to higher debt repayment in renegotiation, decreasing the bene ts of defaulting, and hence allowing the country to borrow more at lower rates. Uncertainty over the insurance payout when the debt is renegotiated also explains the price discrepancy between CDS and bonds. Furthermore, this pricing dynamic during a debt crisis can be used to infer market perceptions of the probability of the CDS paying out after a renegotiation. To quantitatively illustrate the above e ects, the model is calibrated to Greek data and the results show that increasing CDS levels from 0 to 5% of debt lowers the unconditional default probability from 2.6% to 2.0% per year with no impact on debt level. Further increasing the CDS to 40% of debt increases the equilibrium debt level by 15%. ∗For the most up to date version please visit http://www.stanford.edu/~jsalomao/ I am deeply indebted to Martin Schneider, Manuel Amador, Pablo Kurlat and Monika Piazzesi for their support and guidance through this journey. I also thank participants at the Stanford Macroeconomics Lunch and Finance Reading Group. Support from Kohlhagen Fellowship Fund and the Haley-Shaw Fellowship Fund of the Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research (SIEPR) is gratefully acknowledged. Correspondence: Department of Economics, Stanford University. 579 Serra Mall, Stanford, CA, 94305. Email: [email protected]
منابع مشابه
Sovereign Debt Restructuring: Problems and Prospects
This Article reviews the history of sovereign debt restructuring operations with private sector creditors with a view toward diagnosing the factors that lead to inferior outcomes. The Article also attempts to forecast potential problems that may arise in sovereign debt restructuring negotiations in the future and reviews possible modifications of existing institutions. The future potential prob...
متن کاملA Structural Model for Sovereign Credit Risk
This paper provides, and empirically estimates, a structural model of sovereign default risk on external debt. The sovereign endogenously determines its level of foreign debt and default policy. Consistent with default crisis episodes, the sovereign and its lenders bargain at default over a reduction of the debt service. The potential for debt restructuring o¤ers the sovereign greater incentive...
متن کاملDo Sovereign Credit Ratings Affect the Composition and Maturity of Sovereign Borrowing?
In this paper, I develop a theoretical model to analyze the optimal choice between bank loans and bond finance for a sovereign debtor. The model describes a market that is subject to moral hazard and adverse selection. I model the choice between the two debt instruments allowing for debt renegotiation in the event of financial distress, with the possibility of default. The model incorporates pr...
متن کاملSovereign Default Risk, Overconfident Investors and Diverse Beliefs: Theory and Evidence from a New Dataset on Outstanding Credit Default Swaps*
In standard public finance theory a government’s cost of borrowing depends on the common beliefs held by rational investors regarding default risk. We advance understanding of the effects of diverse beliefs and overconfidence among investors in their ability to assess the sovereign’s creditworthiness. Theoretically, we find that demand for insurance against default is positively related to the ...
متن کاملThe Relationship Between Fiscal Opacity and Credit Spreads: A Biased Information Model
Duffie and Lando (2001) were the first to show, under a structural framework, how opacity is priced into credit risk. However, their model is shown to produce results conflicting intuition and empirical observations. In the first part of this study, we propose a biased information model that incorporates skewness into the conditional asset density function. In the second part, we validate our m...
متن کامل